The Ancient Indian Origins of the ‘Sinsemilla Technique’

The so-called “sinsemilla technique” was already employed in southern India at least 500 years ago. There is no debate about this. Reason being, there is the evidence to prove it.

The Ānandakanda (आनन्दकन्द) or ‘Root of Bliss’, a renowned compendium on Indian alchemy compiled around the 15th century, details the process of rogueing out males to produce a seedless crop known as “ganja”. Some experts date the text to as early as the 10th century.

Rich as the modern cannabis scene is in gobshitery, many folks in the West still seem to believe “ganja” is a catch-all term for any kind of cannabis. It very definitely isn’t. Ganja refers specifically to seedless or lightly seeded female inflorescences and the particular tropical domesticates used to produce them (colloquially, Sativas).

Most likely this product – ganja – was developed to be chewed. Searching Monier-Williams for the term yields gṛiñjana (गृञ्जन), “the tops of [Cannabis] chewed to produce an inebriating effect.”* Ganja could be chewed with betel leaf, which is the main ingredient of paan along with areca nut and a range of spices and flavourings. Powdered toasted cannabis is added to paan mixes in contemporary southern India (and in early twentieth-century Bombay so was cocaine!)

Only in the late 1600s do we see the first references to the practice of smoking ganja. The 1600s is likewise when the archaeological evidence shows the sudden emergence of a chillum industry. Tobacco had rapidly taken hold in India in the early decades of the same century and seems to have been the catalyst for the habitual pot smoking with which the world is now familiar. By the late 1700s there appear the first paintings of mass sessions and hookah-smoking dreadlocked yogis.

Based on references to well-known landmarks, a confident guess can be made that the Ānandakanda was composed at Srisailam, an important centre in the sacred geography of Shiva and now part of Andhra Pradesh. The compilers themselves were Naths, followers of syncretistic Shaiva traditions that fuse knowledge and practices from sources as diverse as Islam and Buddhism.

This is the great thing about cannabis culture. Its origins are richly and confidently syncretistic – not frightened by difference but arising out of a culture of mutual curiosity and admiration. So very unlike the grievance cultures that blight contemporary life around the globe, in other words. Perhaps Cannabis really can offer us a way toward “the healing of the nation.”


The header image on the homepage is Dervish Receiving a Visitor, Bijapur, India c. 1620. Shown is a local Sufi shrine of the Shattari Order. The ascetics with beards are dervishes or Sufis, without beards are yogis.

*Though as far as I know both terms can also refer to red onions and other plants, and are the root of misleading claims such as that Cannabis is prohibited in ancient Indian “legal” texts such as the Manusmṛiti (‘Laws of Manu’).

3 responses to “The Ancient Indian Origins of the ‘Sinsemilla Technique’

  1. Pingback: BBC journalist never tried Thai ganja, feeds ‘skunk’ hysteria | The Real Seed Company: The Honest Online Source for Cannabis Landraces Founded 2007·

  2. Pingback: Endangered Varieties of subsp. indica: A Few Thoughts | The Real Seed Company: The Honest Online Source for Cannabis Landraces Founded 2007·

  3. Another nice tidbit about Sinsemilla. Back in the day of the humanists, philosophers and proto-scientists (17-18th century). The question arose around the botanists: do plants have distinct sexes ? Can we selectively breed them like we do cattle ? In the book “Plant Hybridization before Mendel” ( we find this paragraph:

    “””In the following April, Linnaeus sowed seeds of Cannabis in two vessels grown by the window in two different rooms. In one of the vessels, the male and female plants were allowed to grow flowers and bear fruit, which matured in July. The seeds ob- tained, on being planted, germinated in twelve days. In the other of the vessels, all the male plants were removed, at the age when it was possible to distinguish “the antheriferous males” from the “pistilliferous females.” The female plants put forth flowers, the pistils of which lasted unfertilized as long as was required in the other vessel for the fruits to come to maturity, when the pistils, in a quite different manner, immediately withered, after the males had entirely shed their pollen. The unfertilized plants retained their pistils in a green, vegetative condition, and did not wither until when, “after a long time, they were exposed to the afHatus of the male pollen. Although the virgin plants produced large calices, these were empty of living seeds.”””

    Carl Linnaeus grew Sinsemilla as an experiment. And I believe, and it’s sort of implied: He had no problem whatsoever getting valid “regular” non-intersex seeds back in those days in the places he frequently worked (Netherlands, Russia, Sweden, …).


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s