The so-called “sinsemilla technique” was already employed in southern India at least 500 years ago. There is no debate about this. Reason being, there is the evidence to prove it.
The Ānandakanda (आनन्दकन्द) or ‘Root of Bliss’, a renowned compendium on Indian alchemy compiled around the 15th century, details the process of rogueing out males to produce a seedless crop known as “ganja”. Some experts date the text to as early as the 10th century.
Rich as the modern cannabis scene is in gobshitery, many folks in the West still seem to believe “ganja” is a catch-all term for any kind of cannabis. It very definitely isn’t. Ganja refers specifically to seedless or lightly seeded female inflorescences and the particular tropical domesticates used to produce them (colloquially, Sativas).
Most likely this product – ganja – was developed to be chewed. Searching Monier-Williams for the term yields gṛñjana (गृञ्जन), “the tops of [Cannabis] chewed to produce an inebriating effect.”* Presumably, ganja was chewed much as is paan, which comprises betel leaf and areca nut together with a range of spices and flavourings. Perhaps ganja was added to such paan mixes. (In early twentieth-century Bombay, cocaine certainly was!)
Only in the late 1600s do we see the first references to the practice of smoking ganja. The 1600s is likewise when the archaeological evidence shows the sudden emergence of a chillum industry. Tobacco had rapidly taken hold in India in the early decades of the same century and seems to have been the catalyst for the habitual pot smoking with which the world is now familiar. By the late 1700s there appear the first paintings of mass sessions and hookah-smoking dreadlocked yogis.
Based on references to well-known landmarks, a confident guess can be made that the Ānandakanda was composed at Srisailam, an important centre in the sacred geography of Shiva and now part of Andhra Pradesh. The compilers themselves were Naths, followers of syncretistic Shaiva traditions that fuse knowledge and practices from sources as diverse as Islam and Buddhism.
This is the great thing about cannabis culture. Its origins are richly and confidently syncretistic – not frightened by difference but arising out of a culture of mutual curiosity and admiration. So very unlike the deeply insecure and pitifully ignorant grievance cultures that blight contemporary life around the globe, in other words. Perhaps Cannabis really can offer us a way toward “the healing of the nation.”
The header image on the homepage is Dervish Receiving a Visitor, Bijapur, India c. 1620. Shown is a local Sufi shrine of the Shattari Order. The ascetics with beards are dervishes or Sufis, without beards are yogis.
*Though as far as I know both terms can also refer to red onions and other plants, and are the root of misleading claims such as that Cannabis is prohibited in ancient Indian “legal” texts such as the Manusmṛiti (‘Laws of Manu’).